[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[UACCESS-L] New prototype of YouTube currently doesn't do "ads, captions, orannotations", is that a problem?
- To: <uaccess-l@trace.wisc.edu>
- Subject: [UACCESS-L] New prototype of YouTube currently doesn't do "ads, captions, orannotations", is that a problem?
- From: "Robert Carnegie" <Robert.Carnegie@seemis.gov.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:28:58 -0000
- List-archive: <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailarchive/uaccess-l/>
- Sender: uaccess-l-admin@trace.wisc.edu
- Thread-index: Acqbf/9Jv3Dh8GU3R1yC+XivEAanTA==
- Thread-topic: New prototype of YouTube currently doesn't do "ads, captions, or annotations", is that a problem?
Headsup - I don't know where Google and YouTube currently are with accessibility, but their next development appears to be this: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/22/youtube_html5_player/ > Provided you have the right browser, "HTML5 on YouTube" - > as Google calls it - lets you view videos without a Flash plug-in. > Or any other plug-in, for that matter. It does not yet support > videos with ads, captions, or annotations, but Google says: > "We will be expanding the capabilities of the player in the future, > so get ready for new and improved versions in the months to come." If that means "currently no subtitles", it wants watching to be sure that "new and improved versions" don't have discrimination built-in to the new product - whether it is declared finished at some point, or allowed to be an officially incomplete "beta" edition for years. Also the player buttons should be Accessible... anything else? Also for this trial service you need an HTML 5 browser that supports H.264 video (so do accessibility questions apply to the browser and not to this service, or to both?), so from what it says here, Google's Chrome or Apple's, um, it's in Safari I assume. Out of the other "normal" browsers, Opera and Firefox apparently are only providing the Ogg flavour of HTML 5 video support. Microsoft, nothing at all, yet, probably their own(?). Linux - including Opera and Firefox Linux versions - I don't know about, but I suppose open-standard Ogg is what you expect to find there. So this and other web-based video services probably need to have both H.264 and Ogg provision at least, to be compatible with, um, in this case, browsers other than the service provider's own one. That may bear on whether wider compatibility is considered a priority. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. The SEEMIS Group www.seemis.gov.uk **********************************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [UACCESS-L] New prototype of YouTube currently doesn't do "ads,captions, or annotations", is that a problem?
- From: Larry Goldberg <larry_goldberg@wgbh.org>
- Re: [UACCESS-L] New prototype of YouTube currently doesn't do "ads,captions, or annotations", is that a problem?
- Prev by Date: [UACCESS-L] Free Training on Description of Science Images from WGBH
- Next by Date: Re: [UACCESS-L] New prototype of YouTube currently doesn't do "ads,captions, or annotations", is that a problem?
- Previous by thread: [UACCESS-L] Free Training on Description of Science Images from WGBH
- Next by thread: Re: [UACCESS-L] New prototype of YouTube currently doesn't do "ads,captions, or annotations", is that a problem?
- Index(es):